I must acknowledge that, despite all of these science-y things I really do, I still have my vices.
You know when you are just sitting there waiting for the train to take you home, and you wish you had a game to play on your iPhone? You then go home and download this game, fully planning to only play with it if you are tired or waiting? Then you wind up forfeiting the time you ought to have spent doing significant things playing that game rather?

This is the simpsons tapped out hack for me personally (as well as new competition Marvel Contest of Champions, but that is another story).

Every vacation, and sometimes even when it is not a vacation, The Simpsons includes a distinctive holiday upgrade. This year’s Christmas particular allows you to play a traditional game originally called the Prisoner’s Dilemma.
It’s the only real example of a “game” in Game Theory. John Nash, the subject of this movie. A Beautiful Mind, made fundamental contributions to the concept. It’s applications in military strategy, politics, and even sports.
Just how does this function?

In Tapped Out, each player has their own city with their particular characters and homes, etc. It’s possible to see different cities to get things. When you get a gift, you also need to select nice/Lisa, or naughty/Bart.
From the first prisoner’s problem, the problem is introduced as follows:

2 inmates are given a choice of whether to collaborate with or betray another. If they both cooperate, they both function one year. If they both betray each other, they both function 2 years. However, if a person betrays and one cooperates, then the person who betrays goes free, while the person who cooperated gets 3 years.

The problem could be summarized in a table such as this:

Where M, M, S, and T are called “payoffs”. To be a man’s dilemma game, we have to have T > R > P > S that can be accurate for simpsons tapped out hack variant too. As soon as you understand the problem, the question becomes — how can I make a choice that can optimize my winnings?

How do I optimize my winnings into prisoner’s problem?

The Prisoner’s Dilemma is a problem since it appears clear that to optimize both our winnings (altruism), we ought to collaborate. However, if I understand you are honest and will collaborate with me, and I am selfish, then I shall flaw, so that I win more and you get nothing. The problem is, when we both think this way, then we shall both defect and we will both wind up using less. I’d also be reluctant to collaborate since if you’re selfish, then you certainly may defect and I shall wind up with nothing.